What was supposed to be a
graceful exit may be mired in endless enquiries and controversies of what will
be the future of the Church after Pope Benedict XV1’s resignation.
For the 1.2 billion faithful of
Catholic Church, the resignation of the Pope Emeritus came as a surprise and
shock as it was the first time a Pope is resigning in over 600 years. Certain
aspects of his papacy have been controversial to say the least.
His resignation took effect on
Thursday, 28 February, 2013, while Wednesday 27 February was his final day as
Pope, bidding farewell to the faithful with over 150,000 people from all parts
of the world at St. Peter’s Square, Rome.
Outgoing Pope Benedict XVI came in
to the Square in his popemobile clad in a cream suit and moved around in
a sombre atmosphere waving, greeting the multitude who had gathered virtually
from all natioins in the universe; men, women, old and young, children, some on
the shoulders of their parents to catch a last glimpse of the pontiff. The
pilgrims responded with emotional excitement, but no clapping, no chanting, all
quiet; waving flags in response.
Meeting the general audience at the
Square was something usually done inside the Vatican at winter but on this last
day, it was done in the open for all. The following day which was
28th February, was the private farewell restricted only to Cardinals,
although about 55 cardinals, bishops, Nuns were present at the general
audience.
After the tour around the Square, he
gave an emotional farewell address and returned to the Vatican,
packed his luggages, sorted out documents and personal papers and
moved to his summer residence. His papacy ended at 8pm Wednesday.
The event was historic because the
world had been used to Popes who died, then mourning, followed by a funeral
high mass with world leaders – Presidents, Prime Ministers and powerful
political personalities in attendance. This was not like that. This Pope
stepped aside.
His resignation was unprecedented,
moreso at this season of Lent which calls for penance and spiritual reflection,
fasting and prayer.
In retirement, he will be called
Pontiff Emeritus. His papal seal will be destroyed and he will now wear simple
white cassock, won’t wear red shoes any longer but brown shoes given to him in
Mexico, will wear new ring, according to authoritative Vatican source.
Some scandals that plagued the
Vatican may have facilitated the decision to resign. There was a report
prepared by three top cardinals at the instance of the Pope on conflict and
corruption in the Vatican, also including what was termed as inappropriate
influence of a gay lobby within the papacy. Vatican officials were believed to
be taking kick-backs on contracts and involved in money laundering. Benedict
was overwhelmed, frustrated, tired and afraid with a fragile church he can’t
control any longer.
The Italian press had reported that
Benedict XVI asked three cardinals named as Julian Herranz, Josef Tomko and
Salvatore De Giorgi to conduct an internal enquiry after the so-called
Vatileaks scandal. The 300-page report was submitted to him in December 2012
which seemed like a wake-up call for his resignation. It was alleged that there
was an underground gay network among the top hierarchy of the Catholic Clergy
in Vatican and elsewhere. It was believed, he would hand over the report to his
successor for action.
The church was struggling to cope
with cases of widespread child and sex abuse by priests and staff of religious
institutions. There was no adequate measures to properly investigate such cases
and prosecute them. It was like a cover-up taking place and so there was
bottled up subtle anger and need to open church files for prosecution of the
offending clerics.
Even with Pope Benedict XVI
apologising for the abuse and meeting victims personally in several countries
to pacify them, the abuse still persisted.
Before his election as Pope in 2005,
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as he was called, was the head of Vatican’s Doctrinal
Department for many years.
So observers claimed he knew about
these abuses and other terrible sex scandals rocking the church. However, he
lacked administrative will to deal with the problem.
In a church hiding almost
everything, he understood what the problems were but lacked the courage to ask
the bishops to open the archives and the impending cases. For example, in his
own parish in a city in Germany, it was discovered there were 300 cases of sex
crimes. If this is replicated in parishes and archdioces across the world, one
would be amazed at the number of sex cases being hidden.
Even in the Vatican itself, a
reliable source hinted that a Monsignor had love affairs, but was hidden.
Homosexuality is rife in the church,
but there is a massive cover-up amongst the clergy.
Said a Jesuit priest: “To deny this
is to deny the fact and reality, but most priests respect their vows.”
About five days ago, a top Catholic
cleric in Britain, Bishop of Scotland, Cardinal Keith O’Brien resigned in the
wake of allegation by some priests against him for inappropriate behaviour some
years ago. O’Brien said he is not coming to the conclave while the Vatican has
accepted his resignation.
It was damaging to the church.
His response was thus:
“I will respond to the will of God
for me and the Catholic church.”
The British Cardinal denied the
allegation. He participated in the last conclave which elected Pope Benedict
XVI.
US Cardinal Roger Mahony of the
Archdiocese of Los Angeles for many years shielded some priests accused of
sexual abuse, posting them out to avoid interrogation. Cardinal Mahony said he
will be coming to the conclave although he had been publicly rebuked in USA and
told not to participate in the election of the next Pope.
According to a former Catholic
Friar, Mark Dawd, the issue of gay priests in the church was described as
“ticking time bomb”, alleging that 50% of those coming into the prieshood are
gay themselves and that homosexuality is massively represented in the Catholic
Church, which is manifestly at variance with the teaching of the church.
A writer, Mary Elizabeth Williams,
speaking on CNN, acknowledged that the church is passing through extreme crisis
as never before, and so something has to change. She wants more pressure to be
kept on the church for change.
“It’s about forward looking, love,
simplicity, compassion, forgiveness. No matter what, I still remain catholic. I
believe in the virtues of simplicity, forgiveness, elimination of injustice.”
On who is to be next Pope, she said
he could be conservative or progressive, but change is necessary.
Whether women can be priest?
“Unless by chance. It is still long
way. There are girls as altar servers. The posture of Vatican had been
dogmatic, backward looking.”
This is rough time for the Catholic
church.
While Rev Fr. Albert Cutie
acknowledged that Pope Benedict XVI was sick, frail, he said that was not 100%
reason for his resignation.
“What had been happening in the
Vatican are more than what meet the eyes. Strange that the Pope just walked
away. There had been financial mismanagement.”
An Emeritus Archbishop, US-born
Cardinal Theodara Mc Carrick, has said in a TV interview that celibacy was
important in the life of the priest, nature of giving ourselves (priests) fully
to God.
“I accept there is crisis in the
church. Also in a world where there are persecution of Christians. There are
mistakes by leaders everywhere, so too are mistakes by the clergy in the
church.”
A seasoned cleric who had
participated in conclaves with an insight on how voting is done, Cardinal Mc
Carrick said the key moment is when the ballot is given to you to cast your
vote. A voting carinal will say:
“I call on Jesus Christ to guide me
rightly. I think this is the man God wants to lead the church. Let me pick the
right man.” According to him, the election of a new Pope could go to any of the
cardinals and no continent is more favoured. There are many bishops and
cardinals from developing world who can become Pope.








0 comments:
Post a Comment